Why does no one talk about Julie Andrews playing the Kraken in Aquaman? Aside from being a great scene, it's an incredible casting get and a, probably accidental, statement about the historical erasure of feminine religious rites in favour of a more militaristic and masculine culture. I've never really been one to believe that a film can be so visually interesting as to rise above poor writing, The Secret World of Arrietty being my only exception, but I have to say that Aquaman does come close in parts, there is clearly a lot of thought behind the design; Merra's jellyfish dress in the arena fight sequence is great if you just want to Google one example. Not being too familiar with "New 52" Aquaman, in my mind, I was hoping for something a little closer to Justice League Unlimited with a smattering of Batman Brave and the Bold, but the lack of deep cuts to the broader lore of the character was probably the most shocking omission. Seriously, not even a single "Outrageous!"? Not good enough.
At the time of writing this (October 2019, blah blah backlog), Aquaman 2 has just had a provisional date confirmed, but part of me just wishes that Aquaman would remain a stand-alone film that I can go back and enjoy every now and then, like Mystery Men or Daredevil. Despite all of the shade I've been throwing here, I actually quite enjoyed Aquaman both times I've watched it so far. The dumb bits are mostly inoffensive and the good parts are quite good, I can ignore slip ups on the CGI and I would probably grab the Art/Design book if I came across it at a good price. I'm really not sure how this franchise could be improved without the removal of Momoma, he really is the weak link in what is a solid effort in the genre. I've seen a few internet commentators compare Aquaman to Black Panther, but I feel it's really more like Thor, in that it's reasonable, more than a little fantastic, and filled with brilliant design work that only film nerds seem to talk about.
No comments:
Post a Comment